'English tax' is blocking India's startup from reaching its next billion users.

English Tax

Recently, Orin Venture Partners's Reiner Yar Khan tweeted to the primary level enterprise firm:

It seems that Jamamato, Ola and now even starting from China, Indian start-up has lost the Indian 50 meter "real consumer" market:

Khan was not ironic. In fact, he praised the promoters of this company to end the downgrade marketing market boundaries because their next tweet show

I tweet junk clear capitalist / highlighted a fact in the early days of the world but one that is obsolete or can not understand the outside world is to expose - Capitalist / private equity funding in India, in which $ 21 billion 017 ( Calendar year) The goal of a market was ~ 30 million actual consumers.

In my opinion, it does not even hold Rehman Yar Khan as ~ 50m consumers. Base 30 meters-big (see my estimate on the table below). These different consumers, which means ~ one millionth of their gross domestic product of 3 lakh homes and total population ~ 110 million (per family, only five members of ideology are coming), about 9 million dollars in Indian population income For more than one third of a day's income

This part of the iPhone (10m user), Netflix (~ 500,000 paid subscribers) and Amazon Prime Minister (industry observers, according to 10 million members) was created as a brand and audience services. This section includes online buyers of India (20m monthly active online shoppers), their flyer (~ 65 m or 5% population) and their post-paid user (~ 50 m).

When launching a normal VC-fund launch, this is actually the address of this segment which is a startup. Whether it is raw material, an old or a destitute, they are all targeted ~ the consumers pay these 30 meters. In fact, early startups such as Ola or Flipkart still do not end up tapping these categories.

I am going to be trapped in this convenient moniker, and through this prism, I get my thoughts from my mind.

How did I reach this estimate? It says that there are many attempts to define the size of this division. I've compiled these three assumptions - from Teen V, Harsh Chakla and ISPIRT / India Stack, from Sharad Sharma.

Sub-Saharan Africa except Africa's five North African countries (Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco)

Therefore, the best way to see India is Mexico (Rich India 1), the Philippines (Ambitious Ambassador) and Sub-Saharan Africa's South Africa (unconditional India 3); Splurgers, braces and leftovers, I found this as a critic!

Recent comparisons with India's 1 (if it was a separate geographical unit) and Mexico, shows how similar the market size and measurement patterns are.

Based on the above numbers, I am India's most effective way to pay for the most dangerous / app-driven products in terms of actual maximum size of ~ 30 meters.

Thus, we see the most customer-oriented, application-led people, including ~ 110 customers that they are playing in the market, to the size of the Mexico market to see the meter. Keep in mind that Mexico's first phase investment is $ 130 million in 2016 and possibly $ 100 million in 2017. What about India?

Well, in the initial phase of India's market (investment) the market size was $ 2.2 billion, Mexico was 22 times the size! We are approximately 22 times in Mexico as well as Turkey (80 million people, $ 10,500 per person), and about 4 times in Brazil (210 million people, $ 10,000 per person income) we are obviously a very enthusiastic market!

It shows both startup types to get money along with the amount provided in the beginning. The former have understood well and there are enough examples. We have examples in the next section:

In reference to all these specific uses, which is probably the best performance for the Indian market, it is probably better performance as a living or live business. Yet they are quite aggressive funds. what gives

One reason is that changing the shape of faulty market, it estimates that the number of occasions is more realistic, that the VC is not capable of properly making it. They are just as they are. Most VCs see very little from a vacancy category. Was