How the Geo Institute of Reliance was selected as 'Prestige Institute'
Here's how an interpreter Reliance government and
non-organization have become such a big thing.
A total of 114 institutes had applied for the
Institutions of the Amines Plan, with the aim of creating world-class
educational institutions in the country. The elected public institutions will
get Rs 1000 crore in financing and autonomy by stringent rules, while private
people will get autonomy but no money will be available.
One of the applicants met qualifying criteria, 73
public institutions and 40 private. In the latter case, there were 11
"greenfield institutions", which means that they were still only
proposals and were not established. After all, three public and three private
institutions cut down, Geo Institute is the only Greenfield proposal.
The Report of the Expert Committee recommending six
committees states that the Geo Institute's proposal was the only one who
"made the trust of the new institution to meet the harsh goal rather than
within 500 of world ranking in the ten year period" .
Did the selection committee have to select the
Greenfield project?
No. The Geo Institute defeated 27 existing private
institutes, which had applied for this scheme, including the Tata Institute of
Social Sciences, Ashok University, OP Jindal University, Azim Premji University
and the Nursasi Monjee Institute of Management Studies.
In fact, even in the Greenfield category, the
selection of the Geo Institute was done before the proposed Krayya University
in Tamil Nadu, in which the Reserve Bank of India Governor Raghuram Rajan and
the Vedanta University in Odisha. Even the well-established Indian School of
Business, Hyderabad, was passed.
Indian School of Business How was a Greenfield
Project?
Sanjay Kalpur, who created the business school
pitch for the special situation, said that he had applied in the Greenfield
category due to the clarification of the University Grants Commission on 17th
November, 2017, which directs all those institutions which are currently
university Or apply to that category is considered to be a university ".
Unlike the universities established through state
or central law, some existing institutions are considered as
"universities" through the provision of the University Grants
Commission Act, 1956, if they meet certain requirements.
Although forced to apply in the Greenfield
category, the Indian School of Business did not propose to start a new
institution. Instead, it presented a plan that intends to meet the required
goals - 10,000 students, graduate programs and more foreigners in the campus.
How did the panel justify the selection of Xiao
Institute?
Former Chief Election Commissioner N Gopalaswami,
chaired by the selection committee, told the scroll in an interview that other
greenfield applicants have no land, they were talking to the government for tax
exemption for transfer of funds or a project before Had started and were now
planning to start a new one.
Although it was "extremely difficult" to
assess the proposal of the Geo Institute, but the panel has "information
related to the promoter group [Ambani], his financial status, the commitment of
finance and the infrastructure for the new project, his reputation" As
leaders or actors in their respective fields. "On this basis, it"
achieves the strength of the proposal and the desired [reputation institute]
goals Mitigation possibilities understood by ".
So, the access to the Geo Institute for the
Reliance fund and the land was a factor?
It has been stated in the report of the selection
committee that the proposal of the Geo Institute was "well thought out,
well presented, and taking the view of the impressive multi-decade of the
institution building, which is in the processing group's infrastructure Built
on timely construction of competent capabilities and new enterprises ".
A document issued by the Human Resource Development
Ministry states that the Geo Institute has "possession of land" and
its sponsors have made Rs 9,500 crore to make it. An official of the Ministry
said that the land is in Karjat in Raigarh district of Maharashtra. Beginning
of 2013, a Business Standard article shows that Mukesh Ambani was acquiring
land for a university at that time.
As the Vice Chancellor of a private university who
agreed to speak in an unknown way, there is a need for a lot of resources to
establish a new institution. Holding it in the league of the top 500
institutions of the world - presently populated by very old institutions -
within a decade is even more important. Therefore, they argued that it is not
unreasonable to focus on the net worth of the people involved in the project,
although it seems that it can be cross.
What do we need to know about the
selection criteria? Did some factors matter more than others?
The result of the
exercise has left many university administrators wondering what mattered more
to the selection committee – an existing institution’s track record or the
quality of its plans for the future.
That having a track
record mattered in the selection process is evident from the committee’s
report. But ultimately, as the report states, “the goal was singular: to assess
the potential of an institution to be globally ranked among the top 500 in 10
years and eventually among the top 100”.
Though the
University Grants Commission (Institutions of Eminence Deemed to be
Universities) Regulations, 2017 did set out some eligibility criteria, the
focus was on setting targets for the selected institutions. The targets were
based on parameters adopted by international university ranking agencies. The
“indicative list of parameters” that, if met, could get an institution into the
top 500 league were:
- Multidisciplinary or
interdisciplinary teaching and research.
- Courses in “areas of
emerging technology”.
- A “good proportion”
of foreign or foreign-qualified faculty.
- A mix of Indian and
foreign students.
- An admission process
that is “need-blind” – no one will be denied admission for the lack of
resources.
- Research publication
at the “mean rate of at least one per faculty member each year”.
- One teacher for every
10 students in five years.
- Laboratories for
“cutting-edge scientific research”.
- Achieve social impact
through research and innovation.
- Student amenities
comparable to the best in the world.
So the emphasis was on what they
promised to achieve rather than what they had already?
The institutions
were required to produce a “detailed and tangible action plan, milestones, and
timelines” by which they planned to achieve these standards “mentioning
milestones to be achieved in first five years and over 15 years”.
The regulations’
emphasis on plans and targets rather than tangible achievements and track
records certainly made it easier for institutions with no history to compete
effectively with those that do. Jio Institute has no track record but produced
a plan that seemed tailor-made for the scheme. It had done nothing yet, but
promised to meet every parameter.
But the focus on
rankings damaged the prospects of some existing institutions. As the
committee’s report states, the Indian Institute of Human Settlements and the
Institute of Public Health Sciences, both greenfield applicants, did not make
it because they “may not be eligible for a long time for world ranking in view
of the focused areas in which they work”. For them, and similar public
institutions such as the Indian Statistical Institute in Kolkata and the Indian
Institutes of Management, the panel has recommended a separate scheme or plan.
Institutions focusing on specific disciplines and fields of study do not fare
well in “overall rankings” that favour comprehensive institutions.
Jio Institute has
promised to be “multidisciplinary from the start” with 10 schools teaching over
50 disciplines, including the humanities, engineering, medicine, sports, law
and performing arts. It intends to recruit faculty from the top 500 universities
in the world, offering “start-up research packages” to attract them.
Is the fairness of the selection
criteria in question?
Yes. Some have
asked whether greenfield institutes should have been included in the scheme in
the first place.
Several private
university administrators who are not opposed to the selection of a greenfield
project said that such proposals should have been considered a separate
category. Teachers from public universities are more critical of the scheme
being offered to proposed institutions and see it as a way of encouraging
privatisation.
Is there anything else we need to
know?
There are some
other questions about how Jio Institute was selected. A report in the Economic
Times pointed out that Mukesh Ambani was assisted by Vinay Sheel Oberoi,
who was secretary of higher education in the human resource development
ministry when the Institutions of Eminence scheme, then called the World Class
Institutes Programme, was announced in the Union budget of 2016. The Business
Standard meanwhile, reported that the Reliance group incorporated the
Reliance Foundation Institution of Education Research, the sponsor of Jio
Institute, just two weeks before the government notified the rules regarding
the Institutions of Eminence.
Post Comment
No comments